Re: simultaneously reducing both memory usage and runtime for a query

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Faheem Mitha <faheem(at)email(dot)unc(dot)edu>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: simultaneously reducing both memory usage and runtime for a query
Date: 2010-04-01 13:58:33
Message-ID: 20100401135833.GA3014@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Faheem Mitha wrote:

> Regardless, you don't address why the email I sent disappeared into
> the ether. If it was rejected due to excessive length, then it would
> be polite to get an automated rejection. Perhaps something like
>
> "Your message is too long and so is being rejected. Messages to the
> ... mailing list need to be under x lines"

Our mailing lists are set up with a spam filter that's very happy to
drop stuff on the floor without warning at first suspicion. It's not an
easy thing to fix for reasons that are outside the scope of this mailing
list.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-04-01 14:45:08 Re: [Solved] 8.3 Stats Collector Stuck at 100% CPU
Previous Message Greg Smith 2010-04-01 13:11:26 Re: pgreplay log file replayer released