From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Subject: | Small Bug in GetConflictingVirtualXIDs |
Date: | 2009-12-21 03:02:37 |
Message-ID: | 200912210402.37850.andres@anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Simon, Hi all,
HS currently does the following in GetConflictingVirtualXIDs
TransactionId pxmin = proc->xmin;
/*
* We ignore an invalid pxmin because this means that backend
* has no snapshot and cannot get another one while we hold exclusive lock.
*/
if (TransactionIdIsValid(pxmin) && !TransactionIdFollows(pxmin, limitXmin))
{
VirtualTransactionId vxid;
GET_VXID_FROM_PGPROC(vxid, *proc);
if (VirtualTransactionIdIsValid(vxid))
vxids[count++] = vxid;
}
The logic behind this seems fine except in the case of dropping a database.
There you very well might have a open connection without an open snapshot.
This leads to nice errors when youre connected to a database on the slave
without having a in progress transaction while dropping the database on the
primary:
CET FATAL: terminating connection due to administrator command
CET LOG: shutting down
CET LOG: restartpoint starting: shutdown immediate
CET FATAL: could not open file "base/16604/1259": No such file or directory
CET CONTEXT: writing block 5 of relation base/16604/1259
CET WARNING: could not write block 5 of base/16604/1259
CET DETAIL: Multiple failures --- write error might be permanent.
CET CONTEXT: writing block 5 of relation base/16604/1259
Should easily be solvable through an extra parameter for
GetConflictingVirtualXIDs. Want me to prepare a patch?
Andres
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-12-21 03:17:17 | Possible patch for better index name choosing |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2009-12-21 03:01:55 | Re: using separate parameters in psql query execution |