Re: next CommitFest

Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Albert Cervera i Areny
> <albert(at)nan-tic(dot)com> wrote:
> > A Dijous, 12 de novembre de 2009, Euler Taveira de Oliveira va escriure:
> >> Simon Riggs escreveu:
> >> > So, I
> >> > propose that we simply ignore patches from developers until they have
> >> > done sufficient review to be allowed to develop again.
> >>
> >> Is it really impolite for a first-contributor, no?
> >>
> >
> > I don't think so, as long as it's properly explained.
>
> Personally, I would not propose to impose this rule of first-time
> contributors, or even second-time contributors. But by about patch #3
> I think everyone should be pitching in.

I hate to ask, but how would we enforce this? Do we no longer apply
patches for 3rd-time submitters who have not reviewed? That seems to be
hurting us more than them. Are we prepared to discard valid patches
for this reason?

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +