Re: Application name patch - v2

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: daveg <daveg(at)sonic(dot)net>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Application name patch - v2
Date: 2009-10-19 14:33:47
Message-ID: 20091019143347.GF17756@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Pavel Stehule (pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> Superuser permission could not be a problem. Simple security definer
> function can do it.

Then you've defeated the point of making it superuser-only.

I don't think that changing the app name deserves a warning, to be
perfectly honest. Notice should be sufficient.

Thanks,

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-10-19 14:36:19 Re: Application name patch - v2
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-10-19 14:30:05 Re: Rejecting weak passwords