Re: [PATCH] Largeobject access controls

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Largeobject access controls
Date: 2009-10-06 16:42:25
Message-ID: 20091006164225.GL5929@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

KaiGai Kohei escribió:

> I added a syscache entry for pg_largeobject_metadata, not pg_largeobject
> which contains data chunks. The pg_largeobject_metadata is a smaller catalog
> than most of system catalogs, such as pg_class.

The point is not the size of the cache entries, but the number of them.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-10-06 16:56:58 Re: doc/src/sgml/Makefile versus VPATH
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2009-10-06 16:41:21 Re: doc/src/sgml/Makefile versus VPATH