Re: WIP: generalized index constraints

From: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: WIP: generalized index constraints
Date: 2009-09-15 19:49:27
Message-ID: 20090915194927.GJ19673@fetter.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 12:22:46PM -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 12:03 -0700, David Fetter wrote:
> > * "operator-based constraints"
> > A little math-ier, but talks about the API rather than details of
> > the server implementation.
>
> I like this much better. Maybe "index operator constraints" or "operator
> index constraints"?

The word, "index" goes to implementation details, which may change.

Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David E. Wheeler 2009-09-15 20:16:38 Re: Timestamp to time_t
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-09-15 19:30:01 Re: WIP: generalized index constraints