Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types
Date: 2009-09-09 11:47:22
Message-ID: 20090909114722.GA4132@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 10:23 -0700, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> > On Sep 8, 2009, at 10:15 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> > >> arg_a IS DISTINCT FROM arg_b
> > >
> > > Surely you'd want arg_a and arg_b constrained to the same type,
> > > otherwise there is no certainty that that means anything at all.
> >
> > Yes, for the purposes of pgTAP perhaps so. Then it's on the user to do
> > the cast, because she decides that the cast is appropriate. Otherwise,
> > as I said, perhaps it'd be too magical.
>
> That's beginning to sound a bit like a generics feature. E.g.,
>
> CREATE FUNCTION the_same<T>(arg_a T, arg_b T) RETURNS bool AS $$
> SELECT arg_a IS DISTINCT FROM arg_b;
> $$;

Well, you can write that one with anyelement already.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2009-09-09 12:11:41 Re: suggestion to improve planer
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2009-09-09 11:44:27 Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types