From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: 8.5 release timetable, again |
Date: | 2009-08-24 20:51:31 |
Message-ID: | 200908242051.n7OKpVC17218@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus wrote:
> All,
>
> > Yeah, conference-based releases is just a proxy for time-based
> > releases. It's nice to have something to be happy about at the
> > conference too. And it's a convenient time to start talking about the
> > next release when you're all face-to-face.
>
> On the one hand:
>
> I'd say that we go for the 3-CF release. I think we need to prove that
> we can do a time-based release once before a lot of people on this list
> will believe in it.
>
> If we do 4 CFs, we're in danger of still being in beta in late May ...
> and once conference and vacation season start, things get a lot slower.
> Mind you, it's possible that we can shorten the final CF and beta this
> time, but I wouldn't want to count on it.
>
> If we *can* shorten them, then 8.6 can have 4CFs. But we won't know
> until after we've done it.
>
> On the other hand:
>
> I think if we do another release without Standby/replication, we'll
> start to lose a lot of users. People are waiting on that, and a lot of
> folks were expecting it in 8.4.
That is a slightly alarmist. Who are we going to lose these users to?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2009-08-24 20:56:38 | Re: 8.5 release timetable, again |
Previous Message | David Fetter | 2009-08-24 20:35:29 | Re: Bug in date arithmetic |