Re: machine-readable explain output v4

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: machine-readable explain output v4
Date: 2009-08-10 16:28:05
Message-ID: 20090810162805.GB4796@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas escribió:

> What the hell? I have every version of that patch I've ever submitted
> in ~/patch/explain-as-submitted, and that extra semicolon is not there
> in any of them. Furthermore, when I open up the attachment from my
> sent mail, the semicolon isn't there either. Yet I see it at the link
> you provided just as clearly as you do. Is there a bug in the
> archives code???

Hmm, wow, interesting. The mbox from which the archives page is created
does _not_ have a semicolon there. A(nother) Mhonarc bug perhaps?

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-08-10 16:33:24 Re: Segmentation fault when using a set-returning C function from a view in 8.4.0
Previous Message Brendan Jurd 2009-08-10 16:21:02 Re: WIP: to_char, support for EEEE format