Re: GRANT ON ALL IN schema

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Nikhil Sontakke <nikhil(dot)sontakke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <pjmodos(at)pjmodos(dot)net>
Subject: Re: GRANT ON ALL IN schema
Date: 2009-08-10 07:42:34
Message-ID: 200908101042.35024.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wednesday 05 August 2009 19:59:52 Tom Lane wrote:
> Or maybe we are going at this the wrong way? Would it be better to try
> harder to support the write-a-plpgsql-function approach?

This would become much simpler if you could just execute plpgsql code instead
of having to define a function around it. And perhaps if the plpgsql parser
where a bit smarter.

Example:

RUN LANGUAGE plpgsql $$
FOR schema_name, table_name FROM information_schema.tables WHERE whatever LOOP
GRANT ALL ON TABLE schema_name.table_name TO someuser;
END LOOP $$;

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dimitri Fontaine 2009-08-10 07:45:34 CommitFest reviews and application support
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2009-08-10 07:24:31 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Ship documentation without intermediate tarballs Documentation