Re: Review: Revise parallel pg_restore's scheduling heuristic

From: Sam Mason <sam(at)samason(dot)me(dot)uk>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Review: Revise parallel pg_restore's scheduling heuristic
Date: 2009-08-07 16:12:56
Message-ID: 20090807161256.GK5407@samason.me.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 10:39:19AM -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Sam Mason <sam(at)samason(dot)me(dot)uk> wrote:
> > Yes, all that sounds as though you've got it.
>
> Thanks. I read through it carefully a few times, but I was still only
> 80% confident that I had it more-or-less right. ;-)

And which method did you use to determine that you're 80% confident? :)

--
Sam http://samason.me.uk/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-08-07 16:16:08 Re: slow commits with heavy temp table usage in 8.4.0
Previous Message Todd A. Cook 2009-08-07 16:10:47 Re: slow commits with heavy temp table usage in 8.4.0