Re: WIP: Deferrable unique constraints

From: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)googlemail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: WIP: Deferrable unique constraints
Date: 2009-07-20 18:59:37
Message-ID: 20090720185937.GB32219@fetter.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 01:00:12PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> writes:
> >> Please, no. Constraints are not a datatype. Do not copy the brain-dead
> >> decision that put ri_triggers there.
>
> > Does that mean ri_triggers should come out of there?
>
> Not as long as we're on CVS --- it isn't worth the loss of history.
> I might think about it when/if we move to git.

As far as you're concerned, what's blocking that?

Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2009-07-20 19:01:36 Re: [GENERAL] pg_migrator not setting values of sequences?
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2009-07-20 18:52:51 Re: [PATCH] SE-PgSQL/tiny rev.2193