From: | Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Böszörményi Zoltán <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, michael(at)fam-meskes(dot)de, hs(at)cybertec(dot)at |
Subject: | Re: Split-up ECPG patches |
Date: | 2009-07-18 12:18:34 |
Message-ID: | 20090718121834.GB8430@feivel.credativ.lan |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 07:17:17PM +0200, Böszörményi Zoltán wrote:
> as asked by Michael Meskes, I have split up our ECPG patchset:
Just a couple quick comments.
It appears to me (without much testing) that the patches still partly rely on
each other. But I cannot see a reason for this.
> 1. dynamic cursorname (DECLARE :cursorname ..., etc)
> 2. SQLDA support in Informix compat mode (C structure used for
> descriptor and data query)
One file has this:
* (C) 2009 Cybertec GmbH
* Zolt??n B??sz??rm??nyi <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>
* Hans-J??rgen Sch??nig <hs(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Shouldn't this also list a license? In general I wonder whether we need some
statement for every patch submitted? Anyone more into licensing might comment
here.
> 3. DESCRIBE OUTPUT support for named and sqlda descriptors
I don't think we have to add ECPGdescribe2 to keep the old API. The old
ECPGdescribe function does nothing, so it's not worth being kept.
> 4. "string" pseudo-type in Informix compat mode
There is still a lot of stuff being done when not in compatibility mode. I
thought you wanted to change that?
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo/Skype: michaelmeskes, Jabber: meskes(at)jabber(dot)org
Go VfL Borussia! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2009-07-18 12:27:07 | Re: [PATCH] SE-PgSQL/tiny rev.2193 |
Previous Message | Petr Jelinek | 2009-07-18 12:07:14 | Re: [PATCH] DefaultACLs |