Re: [PATCH] [v8.5] Security checks on largeobjects

On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 01:49:14PM +0900, KaiGai Kohei wrote:
> Joshua,
>
> I found your name as a reviewer at the commitfest.postgresql.org.
>
> However, I don't think the initial proposal of the largeobject
> security is now on the state to be reviewed seriously.
>
> In my preference, it should be reworked based on the TOASTing
> approach as discussed in this thread previously, if we can
> find a reasonable solution for the issue I raised before.

For whatever it's worth, I consider my capability limited to making sure the
patch applies and coming up with a few interesting ways of testing it out, but
not seriously studying the code and knowing when there might be a competitive
alternative implementation. I don't yet understand the issues that have been
raised, but will quit working to review the patch if you feel it's not ready.
Thanks for letting me know; I hope a solution to the problems you've brought
up is forthcoming.

--
Joshua Tolley / eggyknap
End Point Corporation
http://www.endpoint.com