| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <pjmodos(at)pjmodos(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: GRANT ON ALL IN schema |
| Date: | 2009-06-18 07:21:36 |
| Message-ID: | 200906181021.36835.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wednesday 17 June 2009 20:27:20 Robert Haas wrote:
> What to do about wildcards is a stickier wicket, and maybe we need to
> decide that first, but I really don't think we should be discouraging
> anyone from investigating this stuff and trying to come up with good
> solutions. There will always be some people for whom a custom
> PL/pgsql function that directly accesses the catalog tables is the
> only workable answer, but we can make PostgreSQL a whole lot easier to
> use by reducing the need to do that for simple cases.
I'm all for investigating it. I just have my doubts that "grant on all tables
in schema X" is a sufficiently general use case, even if you only concentrate
on the simple cases.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2009-06-18 07:33:08 | Re: [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2009-06-18 07:10:55 | Re: machine-readable explain output |