| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Petr Jelinek <pjmodos(at)pjmodos(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: GRANT ON ALL IN schema |
| Date: | 2009-06-17 14:44:07 |
| Message-ID: | 20090617144407.GO20436@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Petr Jelinek (pjmodos(at)pjmodos(dot)net) wrote:
> Stephen Frost wrote:
>> I don't like the idea that a 'GRANT ALL' would actually change default
>> ACLs for a schema though. These are two separate and distinct things-
>> one is implementing a change to existing objects, the other is setting a
>> default for new objects. Mixing them would lead to confusion.
>
> It doesn't. I stated that I am not implementing the second part of the
> TODO item in my first email specifically for this reason (the second
> part was GRANT ON NEW TABLES).
Right.. I was arguing against a few folks who had mentioned they'd like
to see that on IRC and in the past, not against your implementation.
Thanks,
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2009-06-17 14:44:24 | Re: GRANT ON ALL IN schema |
| Previous Message | Petr Jelinek | 2009-06-17 14:42:44 | Re: GRANT ON ALL IN schema |