Re: Any better plan for this query?..

From: Kenneth Marshall <ktm(at)rice(dot)edu>
To: Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Dimitri <dimitrik(dot)fr(at)gmail(dot)com>, Chris <dmagick(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Any better plan for this query?..
Date: 2009-05-06 14:26:32
Message-ID: 20090506142632.GJ23405@it.is.rice.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

No.

Ken
On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 10:04:33PM +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
> Dimitri wrote:
> > Hi Chris,
> >
> > the only problem I see here is it's 2 times slower vs InnoDB, so
> > before I'll say myself it's ok I want to be sure there is nothing else
> > to do.. :-)
>
> Can the genetic query optimizer come into play on small queries?
>
> --
> Craig Ringer
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matthew Wakeling 2009-05-06 14:28:46 Re: Any better plan for this query?..
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2009-05-06 14:04:33 Re: Any better plan for this query?..