Re: Unicode string literals versus the world

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Unicode string literals versus the world
Date: 2009-04-14 18:37:20
Message-ID: 200904142137.21621.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tuesday 14 April 2009 21:22:29 Tom Lane wrote:
> BTW, does anyone know whether Unicode includes the ASCII control
> characters ... ie, is \u0009 a name for tab? If so, maybe this
> syntax is in part an attempt to cover that use-case in the standard.

Yes on both.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2009-04-14 18:37:39 Re: proposal: add columns created and altered topg_proc and pg_class
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2009-04-14 18:34:51 Re: Unicode string literals versus the world