| From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Grzegorz Jaskiewicz <gj(at)pointblue(dot)com(dot)pl>, Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Closing some 8.4 open items |
| Date: | 2009-04-11 19:23:24 |
| Message-ID: | 20090411192324.GN23155@fetter.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 03:12:39PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> > Tom, It fits into 80 columns if you don't have any functions with
> > 11 parameters. ;-)
>
> Well, yeah, but in typical cases I think it fits. A look at the
> current regression database shows all but 6 of 117 functions
> fitting. With another ten characters eaten by a new column, a lot
> more of them would wrap.
>
> > Actually, I'm thinking the new column ought to be called "type".
>
> Yes, that's what I had in mind too.
Excellent idea. I just plain don't believe that there's anything
process-critical and automated that depends on \da, although we could
have it rewritten as an alias for convenience.
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2009-04-11 19:34:31 | Re: Closing some 8.4 open items |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-04-11 19:12:39 | Re: Closing some 8.4 open items |