Re: psql \d commands and information_schema

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Martin Pihlak <martin(dot)pihlak(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: psql \d commands and information_schema
Date: 2009-04-08 16:01:10
Message-ID: 200904081601.n38G1AD01573@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Tom Lane escribi?:
>
> > BTW, I hesitate to mention this and perhaps upset a fragile consensus,
> > but should we remove the special-case code in \df that tries to hide I/O
> > functions by excluding functions that take or return cstring? I think
> > that its value has largely disappeared given the new overall behavior.
>
> +1

Agreed.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hiroshi Saito 2009-04-08 16:01:59 Re: Solution of the file name problem of copy on windows.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-04-08 15:59:49 Re: Closing some 8.4 open items