From: | Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Stark <greg(dot)stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
Subject: | Re: contrib function naming, and upgrade issues |
Date: | 2009-03-23 11:46:52 |
Message-ID: | 200903231246.54628.dfontaine@hi-media.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Monday 23 March 2009 12:34:31 Robert Haas wrote:
> That might not be the only time you ever want to create dependencies
> on the module object. What if the module wants to create an
> additional table, view, etc. at some later time, following the load?
> I'm not sure whether there's a use case for that, but it doesn't seem
> totally implausible.
Then there's Tom's idea of SET module TO ...; to have the context handy, or a
WIP syntax in http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/ExtensionPackaging
CREATE OR REPLACE EXTENSION foo ...
AS $$
$$;
So you could REPLACE an existing extension and add whatever you need to.
--
dim
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2009-03-23 12:41:43 | Re: Have \d show child tables that inherit from the specified parent |
Previous Message | Nikhil Sontakke | 2009-03-23 11:39:18 | Re: Partitioning feature ... |