| From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Over-rigidity in recent to_timestamp() rewrite |
| Date: | 2009-03-14 18:09:39 |
| Message-ID: | 20090314180939.GC29602@fetter.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 01:39:35PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Whilst poking at bug #4702 I noticed that PG CVS HEAD rejects use of
> AD/BC notation, as well as CC (separate century) fields, in
> combination with ISO-style day numbers. I don't see the point of
> this. It's historically inaccurate, no doubt, but so is use of
> Gregorian counting. So I suggest the attached fix. Does this make
> anyone unhappy?
Works for me :)
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2009-03-14 18:16:54 | Re: Should SET ROLE inherit config params? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-03-14 17:39:35 | Over-rigidity in recent to_timestamp() rewrite |