From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Joshua Brindle <method(at)manicmethod(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable |
Date: | 2009-02-09 17:44:24 |
Message-ID: | 20090209174424.GE2870@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane escribió:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > KaiGai Kohei escribi:
> >> One melancholic thing is adding a member into pg_proc.
> >> It defines more than 2000 of entries which I have to modify correctly. :(
> >> Is there any script to help it?
>
> > Try a search for "coccinelle", "sdiff", or was it "spatch"? It got
> > featured on http://LWN.net/ not many weeks ago.
Here it is:
http://lwn.net/Articles/315686/
> FWIW, every single time I've had to add a column to pg_proc (and I've
> done it several times now), an Emacs macro got the job done with a few
> minutes' thought. I'm sure sed would work as well. The contents of
> those DATA lines are really pretty stylized.
I've had to do it only once, but yes, I did it with a simple s// command
in Vim.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2009-02-09 17:55:44 | Re: renaming "storage parameters" |
Previous Message | Marko Kreen | 2009-02-09 17:41:25 | Re: WIP: fix SET WITHOUT OIDS, add SET WITH OIDS |