From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 8.4 release planning |
Date: | 2009-01-29 05:31:01 |
Message-ID: | 200901290531.n0T5V1U27894@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
KaiGai Kohei wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > OK, time for me to chime in.
> >
> > I think the outstanding commit-fest items can be broken down into four
> > sections:
> >
> > o Log streaming
> > o Hot standby
> > o SE-PostgreSQL
> > o Others
>
> - snip -
>
> > SE-PostgreSQL has been in steady development for a year so this is the
> > time to decide about it. My feeling is if we don't accept it now, we
> > are never going to have SE-Linux or row-level security. The next week
> > should show us the right direction when we start discussion on
> > Wednesday, noon GMT.
>
> Hmm...?
> This conditional punishment of death seems to me not a reasonable one.
> If we can found a matter as a result of discussion, which is impossible
> to fix within reasonable term, I'll agree it being postponed to v8.5.
> However, why is the punishment of death necessary here?
What I meant was that this features is not going to get any better than
the work you have done, so if we reject it odds are we will never accept
it.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2009-01-29 05:34:36 | Re: How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable |
Previous Message | KaiGai Kohei | 2009-01-29 05:29:43 | Re: How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable |