Re: 8.4 release planning

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Joshua Brindle <method(at)manicmethod(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 8.4 release planning
Date: 2009-01-27 21:28:53
Message-ID: 20090127212853.GW8123@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Devrim GÜNDÜZ (devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org) wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 15:03 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > With my other hat on (the red one) what I'm concerned about is whether
> > this patch will ever produce a feature that I could turn on in the
> > standard Red Hat/Fedora build of Postgres.
>
> FWIW, as you know, sepostgresql is already included in Fedora. You can
> continue shipping it as a seperate RPM set.

hrmpf, I wonder if that's why RH hasn't been as interested in pushing
for inclusion upstream... Maybe the feel that's a workable solution? I
wouldn't agree... but I don't run RH.

Thanks,

Stephen

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2009-01-27 21:31:50 Re: 8.4 release planning
Previous Message Joshua Brindle 2009-01-27 21:27:29 Re: 8.4 release planning