From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch |
Date: | 2009-01-20 15:44:06 |
Message-ID: | 200901201544.n0KFi6x29926@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
[ There is text before PGP section. ]
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: RIPEMD160
>
>
> > In thinking last night, I am now wondering if a letter is really the
> > right symbol for this. We already have letter flags which control
> > object type selection, but the system table addition is kind of
> > independent of those flags, like '+' now. I am thinking maybe '&' is
> > the right symbol rather than 'A' or 'S'.
>
> What problem are we trying to solve here that is not already solved by
> using 'S' for system tables, which has been in use in psql for over a
> decade now?
Well, the 'S' behavior used to be only system, now it is _add_ system.
Anyway, 'S' is still probably the best choice.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeroen Vermeulen | 2009-01-20 16:01:19 | Re: Fixes for compiler warnings |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2009-01-20 15:42:36 | Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch |