| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch |
| Date: | 2009-01-20 15:38:54 |
| Message-ID: | 20090120153854.GA32428@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce,
* Bruce Momjian (bruce(at)momjian(dot)us) wrote:
> In thinking last night, I am now wondering if a letter is really the
> right symbol for this. We already have letter flags which control
> object type selection, but the system table addition is kind of
> independent of those flags, like '+' now. I am thinking maybe '&' is
> the right symbol rather than 'A' or 'S'.
This really feels like over-engineering at this point. I don't
particularly like '&', and 'S' has been in use like this for quite
some time.
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2009-01-20 15:41:01 | Re: libpq WSACleanup is not needed |
| Previous Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2009-01-20 15:38:28 | Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch |