| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch |
| Date: | 2009-01-20 15:32:29 |
| Message-ID: | 20090120153228.GD3940@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian escribió:
> In thinking last night, I am now wondering if a letter is really the
> right symbol for this. We already have letter flags which control
> object type selection, but the system table addition is kind of
> independent of those flags, like '+' now. I am thinking maybe '&' is
> the right symbol rather than 'A' or 'S'.
& is probably going to be useful as a modifier when we have concurrent
psql, so I suggest you do not use it here. Or maybe not, but in any
case see
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/8204.1207689056%40sss.pgh.pa.us
before you use &.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2009-01-20 15:33:09 | Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2009-01-20 15:17:23 | Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch |