Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch
Date: 2009-01-16 04:00:39
Message-ID: 20090116040039.GK6440@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane escribió:
> Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> > As I mentioned in my other email, this is mainly for PostGIS, but it can
> > certainly apply to other modules. Is this what we would recommend as an
> > approach for these kinds of modules? I feel like that would give
> > -hackers, or perhaps the PostGIS people, some heartburn, but maybe I'm
> > wrong?
>
> If you have an idle evening you might want to peruse all the past
> threads about developing better support for modules.

All the useful material in this area is linked to on the TODO list.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2009-01-16 04:07:19 Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-01-16 03:58:12 Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch