From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch |
Date: | 2009-01-16 04:00:39 |
Message-ID: | 20090116040039.GK6440@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane escribió:
> Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> > As I mentioned in my other email, this is mainly for PostGIS, but it can
> > certainly apply to other modules. Is this what we would recommend as an
> > approach for these kinds of modules? I feel like that would give
> > -hackers, or perhaps the PostGIS people, some heartburn, but maybe I'm
> > wrong?
>
> If you have an idle evening you might want to peruse all the past
> threads about developing better support for modules.
All the useful material in this area is linked to on the TODO list.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2009-01-16 04:07:19 | Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-01-16 03:58:12 | Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch |