Re: stat() vs cygwin

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Reini Urban <rurban(at)x-ray(dot)at>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: stat() vs cygwin
Date: 2008-12-19 03:09:00
Message-ID: 20081219030900.GL5447@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> I'm confused. There is a Cygwin member of buildfarm, working quite
> happily. Can you point me to the exact patch in question, please? I
> thought we resolved the matter of stat() ages ago.

http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/4865F707.6010702%40x-ray.at

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2008-12-19 03:58:52 Re: stat() vs cygwin
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2008-12-19 02:42:35 Re: stat() vs cygwin