Re: Preventing index scans for non-recoverable index AMs

From: Kenneth Marshall <ktm(at)rice(dot)edu>
To: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Preventing index scans for non-recoverable index AMs
Date: 2008-12-17 23:10:40
Message-ID: 20081217231040.GZ26318@it.is.rice.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 06:07:41PM -0500, Jaime Casanova wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 5:47 PM, Kenneth Marshall <ktm(at)rice(dot)edu> wrote:
> > Rebuilding a hash index for the case
> > for which it is preferred (large, large tables) would be excrutiating.
> >
>
> there's such a situation?
>
As of 8.4, yes.

Ken

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kenneth Marshall 2008-12-17 23:12:52 Re: Preventing index scans for non-recoverable index AMs
Previous Message Jaime Casanova 2008-12-17 23:07:41 Re: Preventing index scans for non-recoverable index AMs