Re: Block-level CRC checks

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Stark <greg(dot)stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Block-level CRC checks
Date: 2008-12-15 19:15:13
Message-ID: 20081215191513.GM4067@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Joshua D. Drake escribió:
> On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 14:29 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Joshua D. Drake escribió:
> >
> > > If we can't fix the issue, then yeah let's rip it out but as it sits we
> > > have a hurdle that needs to be overcome not a new feature that needs to
> > > be implemented.
> >
> > Ideas for solving the hurdle are welcome.
> >
> > > Agreed, shall we remove the replication and se postgres patches too :P.
> >
> > There are plenty of ideas for those patches, and lively discussion.
> > They look successful to me, which this patch does not.
> >
> > Please do not troll.
>
> I wasn't trolling. I was making a point.

Okay. Sorry. I was defeating your point.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2008-12-15 19:23:33 Re: Mostly Harmless: Welcoming our C++ friends
Previous Message Jaime Casanova 2008-12-15 19:01:19 Re: Fwd: [PATCHES] Auto Partitioning Patch - WIP version 1