Re: Block-level CRC checks

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Stark <greg(dot)stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Block-level CRC checks
Date: 2008-12-15 16:30:59
Message-ID: 20081215163059.GG4067@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jonah H. Harris escribió:

> Well, we may not need a new idea. Currently, the problem I see with
> the checkpoint-at-shutdown looks like it could possibly be easily
> solved. Though, there may be other issues I'm not familiar with. Has
> anyone reviewed this yet?

I didn't investigate the shutdown checkpoint issue a lot (I was aware of
it), because the really hard problem are hint bits.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2008-12-15 16:37:29 Re: plperl: Documentation on BYTEA decoding is wrong
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-12-15 16:29:52 Re: Block-level CRC checks