| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | DelGurth <delgurth(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tomasz Ostrowski <tometzky(at)batory(dot)org(dot)pl>, Mikkel H?gh <mikkel(at)hoegh(dot)org>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Drupal and PostgreSQL - performance issues? |
| Date: | 2008-10-16 15:26:47 |
| Message-ID: | 20081016152647.GI4452@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-performance |
* DelGurth (delgurth(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> Seems Tomasz linked to the wrong patch. The patch he meant was:
> http://drupal.org/files/issues/drupal_lookup_path-6.x.patch.txt
That's much better.
> Also nice to see people "benchmark" differences by just executing a
> query once[2][3]....
This thread is insane.. Is every change to drupal run through this kind
of design-by-committee? And the paranoia of a cost difference of 0.09ms
for something which ends up getting cached for one particular storage
engine under one particular database?!
Makes me worried about drupal's future, heh.
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-10-16 15:29:53 | Re: PQescapestringConn not found in libpq.dll |
| Previous Message | Tomasz Ostrowski | 2008-10-16 15:26:24 | Re: Drupal and PostgreSQL - performance issues? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2008-10-16 16:27:16 | Re: Drupal and PostgreSQL - performance issues? |
| Previous Message | Tomasz Ostrowski | 2008-10-16 15:26:24 | Re: Drupal and PostgreSQL - performance issues? |