From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Joshua Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches (for CommitFest:Sep) |
Date: | 2008-09-24 18:56:30 |
Message-ID: | 200809241856.m8OIuUF17817@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus wrote:
> Peter,
>
> > Yeah, but do we even have the slightest bit of information about what
> > exactly would be required to achieve the required levels? And whether
> > this patch does it? And whether there would be alternative, more
> > desirable ways to achieve a similar level?
>
> Actually, I have some direct communication that SEPostgres will lead to
> PostgreSQL being widely adopted in at least one US government agency.
> Can't say more, of course. ;-)
We can't make decisions based on just one adoption agency, of course.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2008-09-24 19:10:44 | Re: parallel pg_restore |
Previous Message | A.M. | 2008-09-24 18:55:10 | Re: Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches (for CommitFest:Sep) |