From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Does anything dump per-database config settings? (was Re: ALTER DATABASE vs pg_dump) |
Date: | 2008-08-22 01:55:18 |
Message-ID: | 200808212155.19365.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thursday 21 August 2008 18:28:55 Bruce Momjian wrote:
> We never came up with any idea of how pg_dump could dump ALTER DATABASE
> ... SET commands, so I have added a mention in the documentation, and
> backpatched to 8.3.X; attached.
>
ok, I have no recollection of this conversation :-)
but...
> ! The dump file also does not
> ! contain any <command>ALTER DATABASE ... SET</> commands;
> ! these settings are dumped by <xref linkend="app-pg-dumpall">,
> ! along with database users and other installation-wide settings.
> </para>
>
Is misleading (or maybe just wrong) because those settings are not dumped with
the other installation wide settings. Meaning that pg_dumpall -g has no
bearing on the alter database commands being set, you actually have to
dumpall the entire data set to get those lines.
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-08-22 02:22:27 | Re: Should enum GUCs be listed as such in config.sgml? |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-08-22 01:45:57 | Re: Should enum GUCs be listed as such in config.sgml? |