From: | Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: psql wrapped format default for backslash-d commands |
Date: | 2008-05-09 18:51:51 |
Message-ID: | 20080509185151.GC18081@yugib.highrise.ca |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com> [080509 14:43]:
> On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 4:37 AM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> > Brendan Jurd escribió:
> >> I for one would definitely like backslash commands with very wide
> >> output to be wrapped by default.
> >
> > (At least) one place where I would not like it is in \df+, because
> > wrapped function output would be more difficult to read.
> >
>
> I am a bit conflicted about wrapping on \df. I agree that wrapped
> function code is difficult to read, but what we've got now is
> difficult to read too. Which of the two is more difficult is really a
> matter of personal taste. I guess with \df you have to accept that
> it's always going to be ugly, unless you have a very wide terminal (or
> very short function definitions!).
Isn't that what $PAGER is for?
$PAGER is the main reason why *I* don't want the wrapped format.
a.
--
Aidan Van Dyk Create like a god,
aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca command like a king,
http://www.highrise.ca/ work like a slave.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-05-09 18:56:10 | bloated heapam.h |
Previous Message | Brendan Jurd | 2008-05-09 18:42:24 | Re: psql wrapped format default for backslash-d commands |