From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Brendan Jurd" <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: WIP: psql default banner patch |
Date: | 2008-04-23 00:50:42 |
Message-ID: | 20080422175042.4f6a72d2@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 10:47:32 +1000
"Brendan Jurd" <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 10:37 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > Sure. What did you think about Andrew's suggestion?
>
> I think it's cool; allowing the version to be added to a custom psql
> prompt is a nice feature, regardless of how we go with the banner.
> I'd still like to see the version numbers in the banner in all cases
> though =)
>
> For my usage patterns, once per session is often enough to be reminded
> of the versions. Once per statement (as you'd get from having it in
> the prompt) would be overkill.
O.k. I am not really arguing strongly one way or the other. This is
more an educational exercise for me. However, as someone who is
constantly on dozens of postgresql versions every day, I honestly fail
to see the benefit here. I get that you "like" the idea, what I don't
get is the appreciable benefit to having the version in a matching
system. What do I gain by knowing that I attached to 8.2.4 of psql with
8.2.6 of postgresql?
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Smith | 2008-04-23 05:31:53 | Re: Per-table random_page_cost for tables that we know are always cached |
Previous Message | Brendan Jurd | 2008-04-23 00:47:32 | Re: WIP: psql default banner patch |