| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Commit fest queue |
| Date: | 2008-04-10 02:06:30 |
| Message-ID: | 20080409190630.51ca1d03@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 09 Apr 2008 22:59:43 -0300
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> wrote:
> Damn, this is starting to get to be a trend ... but, I can't but
> agree 100% with this ... we *can* enforce, and I doubt it will have
> much (if any) affect on the # of patches that come in, since ppl want
> to see their work committed, and will follow any *reaonable*
> procedure we have for them to do so ...
>
> Do other large projects accept patches 'ad hoc' like we do?
> FreeBSD? Linux? KDE?
>
KDE is fairly structured. Linux... I don't know. I do know that at one
time a very well known Alan slammed a very well known Linux for using
his inbox as a patch queue (funny isn't it, no offense Bruce). FreeBSD I
would think you would know better than I. However even Debian for all
of its warts is *very* structured.
Joshua D. Drake
--
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2008-04-10 02:07:33 | Re: Commit fest queue |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-04-10 02:05:37 | Re: Commit fest queue |