Re: Commit fest queue

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Commit fest queue
Date: 2008-04-10 01:41:17
Message-ID: 20080409184117.4a756ccd@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 9 Apr 2008 21:38:29 -0400 (EDT)
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:

> I think there is concern that trivial patches wouldn't be submitted
> to a patch tracker, especially by new submitters. Again, I am
> willing to track the ones that aren't in the patch tracker, but then
> we have two places where patches exist (perhaps three with the wiki).
>

Which is horrible. We need to have one place to find this information.

Joshua D. Drake

--
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2008-04-10 01:43:21 Re: Commit fest queue
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2008-04-10 01:40:25 Re: Commit fest queue