| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Chernow <ac(at)esilo(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] libpq type system 0.9a |
| Date: | 2008-04-09 14:15:49 |
| Message-ID: | 20080409141549.GB5233@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Andrew Chernow wrote:
> The core of what I am trying to ask is, there doesn't appear to be an
> advantage to separating libpqtypes from libpq in terms of space. If
> redhat follows their normal policy of include all (probably to make
> their distro as feature rich out-of-the-box as possible), then they
> would distribute libpqtypes.so which would use the same amount of space
> as if it were part of libpq.
My guess is that if we provide an useful library, Redhat will distribute
it some way or another. In the worst case (i.e. Redhat does not
distribute it at all), it will still be available on PGDG rpm
repositories.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Chernow | 2008-04-09 14:19:11 | Re: [PATCHES] libpq type system 0.9a |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2008-04-09 13:58:54 | Re: [PATCHES] libpq type system 0.9a |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Chernow | 2008-04-09 14:19:11 | Re: [PATCHES] libpq type system 0.9a |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2008-04-09 13:58:54 | Re: [PATCHES] libpq type system 0.9a |