Re: [PATCHES] libpq type system 0.9a

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Chernow <ac(at)esilo(dot)com>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] libpq type system 0.9a
Date: 2008-04-08 19:00:57
Message-ID: 200804081900.m38J0v604896@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Merlin Moncure wrote:
> I attributed the silence to general lack of interest and anticipated
> this response. However I think that those involved should step back
> and take a look at what they are walking away from here.

Agreed. There are technical issues, but they can be addressed with
work. The more fundamental issue is whether we want this functionality
in libpq vs pgfoundry, and with a lack of interest, as you stated,
having it on pgfoundry seems the only logical direction.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2008-04-08 19:10:29 Re: [PATCHES] libpq type system 0.9a
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-04-08 18:59:21 Re: [PATCHES] libpq type system 0.9a

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2008-04-08 19:10:29 Re: [PATCHES] libpq type system 0.9a
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-04-08 18:59:21 Re: [PATCHES] libpq type system 0.9a