From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Theo Schlossnagle <jesus(at)omniti(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Expose checkpoint start/finish times into SQL. |
Date: | 2008-04-04 02:41:20 |
Message-ID: | 20080403194120.11dc9d1a@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 03 Apr 2008 22:33:15 -0400
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> JD seems to be on record that the existing logging mechanism sucks
> and he needs something else. That's fine, but I think it means that
> we need to improve logging in general, not invent a single-purpose
> mechanism for logging checkpoint times.
Alright hold on. That is *not* what I said. I said *in this context*
an SQL interface would be nicer. I also said that I was willing to
table the entire discussion based on your review of the patch in that
it didn't offer what I thought it did.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
- --
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFH9ZVSATb/zqfZUUQRAhDJAJ49gMASDA40N9ydhzTTaMBdr/KccQCfei3d
4QXp/4C6iH7GXatqwU5qnuk=
=slQS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Theo Schlossnagle | 2008-04-04 03:26:27 | Re: Expose checkpoint start/finish times into SQL. |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-04-04 02:33:15 | Re: Expose checkpoint start/finish times into SQL. |