| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PROC_VACUUM_FOR_WRAPAROUND doesn't work expectedly |
| Date: | 2008-03-14 16:09:55 |
| Message-ID: | 20080314160955.GK4843@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > How about this other patch?
>
> That's really, really ugly. I'd rather see the flag passed down to
> vacuum_rel as a regular function argument. I realize you'll need
> to touch the signatures of a couple of levels of functions to do that,
> but a global variable for this seems just dangerous.
Okay, I'll do that instead. If I do it quickly, will it be present in
8.3.1? I think it was already tagged so my guess is it won't.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-03-14 16:19:20 | Re: pg_total_relation_size() and CHECKPOINT |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-03-14 16:04:09 | Re: PROC_VACUUM_FOR_WRAPAROUND doesn't work expectedly |