Re: Including PL/PgSQL by default

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Including PL/PgSQL by default
Date: 2008-02-21 19:25:41
Message-ID: 20080221192541.GD4615@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:

> Anyway, as I said before, I don't object to installing plpgsql by
> default. What I do object to is installing it in a way that makes it
> difficult for the DBA to remove it, as would be the case if it were in
> template0 for example.

... which means it can't be installed in template1 either, because
template0 is copied from there.

Perhaps it can be installed in template1 after the copy, if a certain
initdb option is passed?

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message D'Arcy J.M. Cain 2008-02-21 19:35:30 Re: Including PL/PgSQL by default
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2008-02-21 19:15:43 Re: Including PL/PgSQL by default