| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Including PL/PgSQL by default |
| Date: | 2008-02-19 23:30:57 |
| Message-ID: | 20080219153057.0eea830a@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 18:13:53 -0500
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> I am having trouble locating the previous thread - can someone please
> point me at it?
I am having trouble finding one that makes a cohesive argument against
but here we go:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-sql/2000-05/msg00215.php
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2004-04/msg00952.php
Of course there are tons of results of users wondering why we don't
offer such as simple and useful feature.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
- --
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL SPI Liaison | SPI Director | PostgreSQL political pundit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHu2ayATb/zqfZUUQRAmL7AJoCQyNmbLIbZNXG9JjMQu2ax/vRJQCfcevF
TF6TzTSr/1ep8PuSNMcGK2g=
=bFqN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2008-02-19 23:33:22 | Re: Including PL/PgSQL by default |
| Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2008-02-19 23:25:44 | Re: Including PL/PgSQL by default |