From: | Douglas J Hunley <doug(at)hunley(dot)homeip(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: 7 hrs for a pg_restore? |
Date: | 2008-02-19 20:20:33 |
Message-ID: | 200802191520.33528.doug@hunley.homeip.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Tuesday 19 February 2008 15:16:42 Dave Cramer wrote:
> On 19-Feb-08, at 2:35 PM, Douglas J Hunley wrote:
> > On Tuesday 19 February 2008 14:28:54 Dave Cramer wrote:
> >> shared buffers is *way* too small as is effective cache
> >> set them to 2G/6G respectively.
> >>
> >> Dave
> >
> > pardon my ignorance, but is this in the context of a restore only?
> > or 'in
> > general'?
>
> This is the "generally accepted" starting point for a pg db for
> production.
fair enough. I have scheduled this change for the next outage
--
Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778
http://doug.hunley.homeip.net
"The internet has had no impact on my life whatsoever.com" - anon
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | JP Fletcher | 2008-02-19 20:21:16 | Re: Fwd: wal_sync_methods for AIX |
Previous Message | Dave Cramer | 2008-02-19 20:16:42 | Re: 7 hrs for a pg_restore? |