Re: additional info needed to list 'data slab' as a postgresql service provider?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 16:42:15 +0000
"Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:

> On Feb 19, 2008 4:37 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 15:46:35 +0000
> > "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Now if the listing were to offer pre-installed VPS's with
> > > PG+Apache+PHP, and there was specific support for that software
> > > combination (or some similar set of technologies), then it would
> > > qualify. Note that we also expect such support to be mentioned on
> > > the companies website.
> >
> > Do we have these requirements documented anywhere?
>
> No - that was merely a suggestion for something that would have got
> Jeff's listing approved.

What I meant was, is there a write up somewhere that generally
describes how we evaluation each submission for approval. If we don't
have that, we appear arbitrary.

Joshua D. Drake

- --
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL SPI Liaison | SPI Director | PostgreSQL political pundit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHuwgyATb/zqfZUUQRAuuQAJ4nB3S9+jg58pChaF27DvLcyVjiQgCeNddZ
9FE/2OY2YOzVWCM0EnpBLNE=
=2IvL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----