| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: configure tag'd 8.3.0 and built witih autoconf 2.59 |
| Date: | 2008-02-04 22:16:07 |
| Message-ID: | 200802042316.08618.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> As best I recall, the immediate branch after 8.2 was the exception not
> the rule --- we've usually waited longer than that.
8.2, 8.1, and 8.0 were branched off the x.y.0 release tag. 7.4 was branched
at rc1, 7.3 was branched at beta4, 7.2 was branched at final release, 7.1 was
branched at 7.1.1. So no. :-)
Personally, I don't agree with following this endless release cycle with an
additional indefinite waiting period.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2008-02-05 01:28:12 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: configure tag'd 8.3.0 and built witih autoconf 2.59 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-02-04 19:44:21 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: configure tag'd 8.3.0 and built witih autoconf 2.59 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2008-02-04 22:25:23 | Re: FW: bitemporal functionality for PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-02-04 22:06:22 | Re: Why are we waiting? |