Re: Sun acquires MySQL

From: Ivan Sergio Borgonovo <mail(at)webthatworks(dot)it>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Sun acquires MySQL
Date: 2008-01-21 17:33:58
Message-ID: 20080121183358.7a2e6519@webthatworks.it
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 08:01:49 -0600
Russ Brown <pickscrape(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Perhaps it would be useful to have a page in the documentation that
> provides a brief comparison between the available pl languages
> (including plpgsql and sql) and gives suggestions on the best one
> (or ones) for given use cases?

It'd be very appreciated.
I tried to read this:
http://www.pgsql.cz/index.php/PL/pgSQL_(en)#When_is_PL.2FpgSQL_not_applicable
But I'm not sure I really grasped it.

Some comparison/examples more may help.

BTW today pg 8.3-rc2 reached Debian sid amd64 and I took a chance to
see what was available... and there is support for a *lot* of
languages now.

I started to develop a lot of functions code thinking that pgsql was
the nearest thing to the metal after plain sql and after these post I
was wondering if python (or ruby??) would have made a better choice.

My main concern when I chose the function route was limiting the
number of connections and hiding the underlying structure of the DB
to the client application.

--
Ivan Sergio Borgonovo
http://www.webthatworks.it

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christian Schröder 2008-01-21 17:34:07 Re: Views and permissions
Previous Message Niederland 2008-01-21 16:56:00 Re: postgresql 8.3rc1 on vista